Kidman: Scientology to Blame
September 10th 2007 06:45
What is Nicole Kidman's problem? Has she not gotten enough publicity in the past week following her Vanity Fair interview? Is it not enough that she has people world wide guessing who her 'mystery' fiance was?
The latest 'revelation' comes in this week's Woman's Day 'I've lost my kids to Scientolgy'. The title here says it all but i have to disagree with you Nic. You lost your kids because you chose not to be apart of their life. You chose to galavant from one place to another with one man to another than play a more active role in your kids life. You have the money and power to fight for those children if you really wanted to - clearly you don't.
| 124 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog


















Comment by Damo
For the Sake of Argument
My Apologetics
It is worth reading up on them.
They do enforce family seperation from exmembers and even hire private investigators to dig up dirt.
This is part of what the founder L Ron Hubbard described as 'Fair Game'.
Comment by Chic Critique
Are we judging someone based on an article read in Woman's Day?
I'm not sure if either of these are wise.
Cheers
CC
Comment by David
I'm glad you don't have any problems, and are just pretending to be Catholic. You're a step ahead of everyone aren't you? You're just seeing if any real Catholic parents read Orble posts aren't you? Ones who don't read Vanity Fair, and Woman's Day or look at all the pics of immodest women on the cover and on the inside pages? You don't even read those magazines do you? You're too busy attending church, reading Sacred Scripture and raising children who obey all of God's Commandments aren't you?. I bet you even have apparitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary at work, and she tells you to Blog against immmodesty and celebrity by having a celebrity blog. You kidder you.
I loved the subtext of this one:
Especially the way you pretend you don't know what grammar is. You kidder you.
Way funny. I get it. As if you're into media. You're out to save the world from immorality aren't you?
Boy, you nearly got away with this post. I hope not too many people read my comment. It might expose you as a kidder not a Kidman. A Kidwoman? Or a Kidperson?
Comment by Big Cat
Chatterpillar
Comment by Aziza Ibrahim
Celebrity Best
Nicole Richie - A VERY Simple Life Indeed
Azangelina
Do you have Cold Feet?????
Bulldogs Vs Storm - Where's the Ref?
I can say though that i have been working in media and publishing for last 10 years and that included Woman's Day publisher ACP. So yes, i do read that crap, how else can i comment on it?
Above all, i am not a Kidman fan! I am so sick of her seeking pity with all these 'revelations' in order to put herself back in the limelight.
Comment by Anonymous
All i am trying to say is that Nicole is mother to those kids and if she truly wanted to be more part of their life then i am sure there are ways around it.
Comment by Anonymous
I know that not everything we read in magazine should be taken as gospel, especially the weekly gossip magazines. However, following Nicole's recent interview with Vanity Fair, it seems nothing is sacred anymore and Nicole is out there dishing the dirt and looking for sympathy to anyone who will listen. That is my take on the situation and i am sticking to it.
Comment by Aziza Ibrahim
Celebrity Best
Nicole Richie - A VERY Simple Life Indeed
Azangelina
Do you have Cold Feet?????
Bulldogs Vs Storm - Where's the Ref?
Comment by Aziza Ibrahim
Celebrity Best
Nicole Richie - A VERY Simple Life Indeed
Azangelina
Do you have Cold Feet?????
Bulldogs Vs Storm - Where's the Ref?
All i am trying to say is that Nicole is mother to those kids and if she truly wanted to be more part of their life then i am sure there are ways around it.
Comment by Aziza Ibrahim
Celebrity Best
Nicole Richie - A VERY Simple Life Indeed
Azangelina
Do you have Cold Feet?????
Bulldogs Vs Storm - Where's the Ref?
I know that not everything we read in magazine should be taken as gospel, especially the weekly gossip magazines. However, following Nicole's recent interview with Vanity Fair, it seems nothing is sacred anymore and Nicole is out there dishing the dirt and looking for sympathy to anyone who will listen. That is my take on the situation and i am sticking to it.
Comment by Damo
For the Sake of Argument
My Apologetics
I know womans days is not the most reliable source, so I don't actually know how Kidman has or has not been looking after her kids. Nor would even care who she is sleeping with. Frankly she is not my type, never been attracted to redheads. Not sure why.
However only if you are interested you could look up a site called www.xenu.net.
Comment by Big Cat
Chatterpillar
Anyone else out there got experience of them and their fixation on engrams?
Comment by KylieW
Celebrity Obsession
I'm a religion ignoramus (and I'd like to keep it that way) so I can't claim knowledge of Scientology. And also take everything written in any womens mag with a grain of salt. But I have to say, I agree with you. If she really wanted to be a bigger part of those kids lives she could have been.
She's an enormous star with access to a media that already paints Cruise as a nutter. She would get more than enough sympathy from the media (and lets face it, it's mostly trial by media these days).
Sure, Tom's scientology beliefs could have made it really difficult, but she had more tools than most at her disposal.
Mind you, I dislike Nicole intensely........so I'm hardly unbiased! hehehe.